California’s Minimum Wage Experiment Defies Critics, Boosting Jobs in Fast-Food Sector
When California passed a law in September 2023 to raise the minimum wage for fast-food workers to $20 an hour, it faced widespread criticism. Many predicted economic disaster, with claims of mass layoffs, restaurant closures, and soaring menu prices dominating headlines. However, data from the first six months of implementation tells a different story: California’s fast-food sector has added jobs, defying the negative narrative.
---
The Debate Around Minimum Wage Increases
Critics, including business groups and political opponents, have long argued that higher minimum wages harm employment by making workers too expensive to hire. Yet decades of research suggest otherwise. Studies of more than 500 minimum-wage increases across the U.S. since the 1990s show that the impact on jobs is minimal and often positive. Higher wages can reduce turnover, improve productivity, and lower recruitment costs.
California’s fast-food wage increase—one of the largest ever studied—provides new insights. Contrary to warnings of economic fallout, the sector saw more than 5,000 jobs added in the six months following the wage hike.
---
Exposing Flawed Criticism
Many of the early claims of job losses were based on misleading data. For example:
A widely cited report from the Hoover Institution claimed that 10,000 fast-food jobs were lost in late 2023. However, this figure failed to account for seasonal employment trends. Adjusted for these factors, the data revealed job growth instead.
Another report from the Employment Policies Institute claimed job losses in California relative to neighboring states. Yet the analysis cherry-picked data starting in January 2024—just before the wage increase took effect—ignoring broader trends showing job growth.
In reality, seasonally adjusted data and comparisons with similar states confirm that California’s fast-food sector has grown since the wage hike.
---
Positive Outcomes for Workers
The wage increase has delivered tangible benefits:
Higher Earnings: Fast-food workers received an average 18% raise, significantly boosting their purchasing power.
Stable Employment: Studies found no reduction in hours worked or employee benefits.
Even menu price increases—averaging 3.7%—were far below the “$20 Big Macs” critics warned about. Researchers estimate that the wage hike was largely absorbed through slightly higher prices, reduced turnover, and lower profits for franchise owners.
---
The Political Backlash
Despite its success, the law has faced relentless criticism. A well-funded campaign by industry lobbyists helped defeat a 2024 ballot measure to raise the state’s minimum wage to $18 for all workers. This resistance, fueled by misleading claims about California’s fast-food experiment, undermines efforts to improve wages in other states, particularly those still adhering to the federal minimum wage of $7.25.
---
A Blueprint for the Future
California’s experience challenges conventional wisdom about minimum wage policies. By raising wages without hurting employment, the state has demonstrated that higher pay can coexist with economic growth. For the 20 states still stuck at or below the federal minimum, California offers a model worth considering—if policymakers can look past the myths and focus on the data.
